Why Everyone should disregard Drake University Professor Dennis Goldford's Idiotic Comments in the Jan 6, 2012 Des Moines Register article
about County GOP Chair Lyle Brinegar confirming that the Edward L. True Affidavit stating that Romney got 20 votes less in True's precinct/Caucus than the State Iowa GOP HQ posted on its website could Discredit the Iowa Caucus Process

Please disregard the idiotic comments of Professor Dennis Goldfarb of Drake University in the relevant Des Moines Register article linked on the WatchTheVote2012 home page.

Goldfarb, whatever his state of knowledge, ignorance, or craftiness is, -- is in effect, running interference for the Powers-that-be in in the interlocking network consisting of the Des Moines state GOP HQ (and the RNC, the DNC, and all state party HQs, both Democratic and Republican), at Goldman-Sachs, and at the FED.

All of these powerful forces want to get rid of the current process in the Iowa Caucuses because it is the ONLY major Presidential contest which is COMPLETELY transparent and open at the LOCAL level. As we have pointed out repeatedly -- it's the election crooks at the Iowa State GOP HQ, NOT the Iowans at the local level, who want a secret, "black box" process in order to muddy up water and the results.

Is Goldford so stupid that he can't discern that the Iowa People at the local level did it right and transparently, and that his friends at the Iowa GOP State HQ were the ones who ERRED, with their easily rigged computers, programmed by unknown programmers, using software the public is not allowed to examine, in their secret locations, off limits to the public BUT open to their fellow travelers of the Computer VoteFraud Syndicate in the major national newsmedia?

If Dennis Goldfarb was worthy of the name "professor" -- he would be smart enough, or honest enough, or would have done enough research to see this. If he hasn't researched the issue, he needs to start by doing a google search for the article, "A House without Doors", and read it, before he further comments.


The Iowa Caucuses at the local level are TOTALLY OPEN AND HONEST, the way all caucuses and all local elections should be. They vote in the open and count the paper ballots right there on the spot, BEFORE all the local people, BEFORE the paper ballots leave public view. This is the way AMERICAN elections are held. Do you understand?

In all the other 49 states, and even Iowa in the General Election, with maybe 1% of the counties in the USA excepted, the Computer VoteFraud Syndicate (RNC, DNC, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX, AP wire, National Election Pool - owned by the previously named 6 Big media outlets - and Diebold, ES &S, Hart, and Sequoia) snatch the ballots from the local citizens BEFORE the votes our counted -- and then they issue a "result" on their easily rigged computers, programmed by unknown programmers, on secret software that neither the public NOR the local Boards of Election people are allowed to examine (!!!). This is un-American. This is how tin horn dictatorships and Communist countries run elections. This is against two US Supreme Court decisions (see 10 minute youtube, "South Carolina, Super Tuesday, and Ron Paul" for documentation).

And this "secret ballot count" process is specifically against the state law in many states. It is against common sense. It is against the phrase "consent of the governed" in the Declaration of Independence, and it is against the US Constitution which calls for the ELECTION of the US House of Representatives and the President, NOT the SELECTION of these men or women by a Ruling Elite that controls the easily-rigged secret computer counts. (See the HBO documentary, "Hacking Democracy", for how, when there is a recount -- which recount takes place circa 21 days after election day, -- the four mega-computer companies make sure the "ballots" which are brought back out into public view, match the computer "results" announced on election night.)

So, I've unloaded on Professor Goldford, because he is like the vast majority of "authorities" on elections -- bolstering the totally criminal and illegal and unconstitutional secret computer vote-count process, and  casting bad light on the Iowa Caucuses, which is totally American, above board,  and transparent -- at the local level.

Better for all of us to take our cue from Dr. David Dill of Stanford University, and other professors who see through the computer "elections" ruse. Dr. Dill said:

"Why am I always being asked to prove these systems aren't secure? The burden of proof ought to be on the vendor. You ask about the hardware. 'Secret.' The software? 'Secret.' What's the cryptography? 'Can't tell you because that'll compromise the secrecy of the machines.'... Federal testing procedures? 'Secret'! Results of the tests? 'Secret'! Basically we are required to have blind faith."

óDr. David L. Dill
Professor, Computer Science
Stanford University